XMPP, Mastodon, etc. aside the Web became centralized largely because we who built for the Web let it happen. The Web used to be a lot more decentralized where we, the people who built stuff for the Web, wrote in our blogs and helped each other learn this thing we were at the same time developing standards for to improve. This all ended when almost all of us converged on Twitter.
The problem with all of these decentralization-is-bad write-ups is that they miss the forest for the trees -- including the ones that point out that non-technical people can't run their own servers. If it's a fallacy to attempt to re-decentralize the Internet then we might as well just give up and stop using it then. Let's surrender absolutely everything we do on the Internet to these big companies. A technological democracy cannot exist without decentralization.
I bought a 2nd gen Nest thermostat several years ago. It paid for itself within two months and some change especially considering I installed it during the summer here. I'd put off getting something else after Google bought Nest because they at least kept the company separate. I knew eventually they'd fold it in and start collecting information they don't have a right to have. Guess that's happening now.
I do find it funny when Europeans rant about price tags in the US (and Canada) not including tax. It’s an inconsequential thing to rant about first of all, but we do have one major purchase that is tax-included and that’s gas (petrol). As a result almost no one knows how much they pay in tax to fill up their tank, and in a few places in the US taxes on it are egregiously high. On the other hand when buying say... art supplies I’m always faced with how much I pay in tax.
capitalist waste Show more
this is what we had aux ports taken away for. I hate the devolution of headphone tech
Small tree that has to fill a gap in a tree tunnel. Probably some wisdom in here. Like growing into one‘s position. Or having no choice. Or being trimmed to fill a predefined life. Or… https://www.instagram.com/p/BxDGFdpg1oz/?utm_source=ig_twitter_share&igshid=cduv85m850b8
Librem.one, Moderation Discussion Show more
Admins: perhaps you should consider blocking social.librem.one. This instance’s policies could affect the safety of many of us on the fediverse. The instance automatically rejects both local and remote reports, meaning there is no way to bring bad users and content to the attention of their moderators. See here: https://source.puri.sm/liberty/smilodon/commit/9cae431902a2c0ce6438c6722a3a901e279c78fc
In discussion within their chatrooms, I received this response:
quick note about reporting (copied from other chat room): this is correct, after deep deliberation we have concluded that no company should control speech - we have a “stay safe” guide in the pipeline, but briefly, block bad users and report illegal content - in the long-term federated, community-managed blocklists are likely the answer
This does not seem right to me - if we’re subjected to their users, the only action admins can take is to block their server rather than have our issues addressed. This makes for a poor member of the fediverse.
Designer & Illustrator. Opera Software alum. Ook!